Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Beale

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 29, 1816PublishedCited by 2 opinions

¡ IN an action for assumpsit, in the county court of Fau- ' quier, for goods sold and delivered, &c. (the declaration containing also a count upon an insimul computassent, and the plea being non assumpsit,) the plaintiff proved, by a single witness, “ that some time ago, (the precise time he did not recollect, “ he met with the defendant, in the court house yard, on a court “ day, and called upon him to execute his bond to the plaintiff, “ for a large account, amounting to…

Read the full summary

¡ IN an action for assumpsit, in the county court of Fau- ' quier, for goods sold and delivered, &c. (the declaration containing also a count upon an insimul computassent, and the plea being non assumpsit,) the plaintiff proved, by a single witness, “ that some time ago, (the precise time he did not recollect, “ he met with the defendant, in the court house yard, on a court “ day, and called upon him to execute his bond to the plaintiff, “ for a large account, amounting to about 126i.; to which the “ defendant replied, that he expected to receive some money, “ for 1 and which he had sold, in…

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Roane

pronounced the court's opinion, that both the judgments of the Superior Court of law be reversed, and that of the county court affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Green v. Buckner's adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1835
  2. Thweat & Hinton v. Adam FinchCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1793

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API