Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonald

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1978No. 75-1870, 75-1871PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:

In United States v. MacDonald, 435 U.S. 850, 98 S.Ct. 1547, 56 L.Ed.2d 18 (1978), the Supreme Court held that a defendant may not obtain interlocutory appellate review of an order denying his pretrial motion to dismiss an indictment because of alleged infringement of his sixth amendment right to speedy trial. * On remand, we granted Jeffrey R. MacDonald’s motion for supplemental briefing on the issue of double jeopardy.

We conclude that the proceeding against MacDonald under Article 32, U.S.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. § 832, and the commanding officer’s review were investigative.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. United States v. Gary Lee SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. MoellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. United States v. MacDonaldDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1991
  5. Nada Pacific Corp. v. Power Eng'g & Mfg., Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API