Ex Parte Preston
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
OPINION DENYING STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
On original submission we granted appellant relief and ordered the prosecution dismissed. The State contends that result is erroneous for several reasons. We now address those contentions.
I
On original submission we began by stating, “[t]he facts are not in dispute ... there is no evidence in the record that the State took any affirmative action to dismiss, waive or abandon or that the State obtained permission for the trial judge to dismiss, waive or abandon the first and third counts in that indictment.” Maj. op. pg. 517. The State contends we…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Vanderbilt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.