Legal Opinion

State v. Berlin Street Railway

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 1, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The state does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of the public service commission, but contends that the exemption granted the defendant is a special one and therefore invalid under the rule of Eyers Woolen Co. v. Gilsum, ante, 1.

The statutory provisions authorizing the exemption (P. L., c. 69, ss. 28-31) are as follows:

“28. Street Railways. Any corporation owning or operating a street railway property within this state, which is incapable under proper management of earning sufficient money to pay its operating expenses and fixed charges, including taxes and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canaan v. Enfield Village Fire DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  3. State v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
  4. Perry v. KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API