Legal Opinion
Prowell v. Parks
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1989PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOPER, Justice.
This appeal presents the issue as to whether T.C.A. § 62-13-105 prohibits any action to recover a real estate commission, including an action based on promissory fraud, by a person not licensed as a real estate broker.
Milton Prowell filed this action to recover one-half of the real estate commission paid the defendants from the sale of the Riddley farm on the bases of contract, quantum meruit, and promissory fraud. The trial court dismissed the complaint on Rule 12 motion of the defendants. No issue was made of the dismissal of the contract or quantum meruit claims.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dickerson v. Sanders Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bowden Building Corp. v. Tennessee Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Business Brokerage Centre v. DixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Ares Funding, LLC v. Ma Maricopa, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Burks v. Elevation Outdoor Advertising, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Bennett v. MV InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.