Peltz v. . Bailey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from hong, J., at April Term, 1911, of Mitchell. ’ Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Chief Justice Ciarle.
1DissentBrown, J.
The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARK. This is an appeal from an order dismissing an appeal from a justice of the peace. The judge finds the facts as follows:
The judgment was rendered by a justice of the peace 22 July, 1910. The defendant appealed and gave notice thereof in open court. The justice was doubtful whether his fee of 30 cents had been paid, but upon conflicting evidence the court found that it had been. The next term of the Superior Court began 25 July and the next regular term was held in November. The appeal was not sent up till…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Pepper v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Boing v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Davenport v. GrissomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abell v. Thornton Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- State v. . FlemingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Summerell v. Chilean Nitrate Sales Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Pickens v. . WhittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Abell v. Thornton Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.