Legal Opinion

Marriage of Rydell v. Rydell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 18, 1981No. 50882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

The respondent below, Marjorie E. Ry-dell, appeals from the judgment in her marriage dissolution proceeding, claiming the award for spousal maintenance is inadequate. The trial court, believing it was bound by res judicata, awarded the same spousal maintenance as had previously been awarded in an earlier separation action. We reverse and remand.

At the time of trial, in August 1979, Harry and Marjorie Rydell had been married 37 years. Mr. Rydell was 56 and his wife 57. Mr. Rydell had worked for his company 29 years. His 1978 gross income was $23,820.79 and his monthly net…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marriage of Hecker v. HeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Marriage of Sand v. SandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Marriage of Beck v. KaplanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Marriage of Stevens v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Borgeson v. BorgesonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API