Legal Opinion

Holland v. Holland

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 22, 1977No. Record 760418PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this automobile accident case, we apply the Massie-Firmstone * maxim that if a litigant, a person of average intelligence and in possession of his faculties, testifies clearly and unequivocally to facts within his knowledge which show as a matter of law he has no case, he is bound thereby and may not recover. Baines v. Parker, 217 Va. 100, 225 S.E.2d 403 (1976); Scott v. Foley, 205 Va. 382, 136 S.E.2d 849 (1964).

On April 11,1975, in the City of Portsmouth, plaintiff-appellee Sharon A. Holland was a passenger in the right front seat of an automobile being driven by her husband,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Massie v. FirmstoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. Baines v. Parker and GladdingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  3. Saunders and Rittenhouse v. BulluckSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
  4. Yates v. PottsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  5. Scott v. FoleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. MartinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  2. Wheeler v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  3. Dial v. DeskinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  4. Evans v. BrileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  5. Pratt v. QueenNorfolk County Circuit Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API