Holland v. Holland
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Per curiam
In this automobile accident case, we apply the Massie-Firmstone * maxim that if a litigant, a person of average intelligence and in possession of his faculties, testifies clearly and unequivocally to facts within his knowledge which show as a matter of law he has no case, he is bound thereby and may not recover. Baines v. Parker, 217 Va. 100, 225 S.E.2d 403 (1976); Scott v. Foley, 205 Va. 382, 136 S.E.2d 849 (1964).
On April 11,1975, in the City of Portsmouth, plaintiff-appellee Sharon A. Holland was a passenger in the right front seat of an automobile being driven by her husband,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Massie v. FirmstoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Baines v. Parker and GladdingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- Saunders and Rittenhouse v. BulluckSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
- Yates v. PottsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
- Scott v. FoleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pierce v. MartinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Wheeler v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- Dial v. DeskinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Evans v. BrileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Pratt v. QueenNorfolk County Circuit Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.