Legal Opinion
Martindale v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 1935No. Claim No. 23570PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. The State does not challenge the amount of the award. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for a reversal on the law and facts and a new trial. (The judgment is for damages for death of claimant’s intestate resulting from injuries received in a State institution.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
2Cited by15 opinions
- Callahan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1943
- Root v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1943
- Dowly v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
- Burtman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
- Berg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.