Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Holtzscheiter v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 22, 1998No. 24842Published

1Concurrence

TOAL, Justice:

In his majority opinion, the Chief Justice holds that this case should be reversed and remanded with a verdict directed for defendant as to punitive damages and a new trial absolute conducted as to actual damages. I fully concur in this result. Moreover, I believe that there is much merit to the analysis set forth in the majority opinion. It recognizes the error, or at least, the hopeless confusion of Holtzscheiter I and attempts to correct it. Further, the opinion attempts to clarify the issues surrounding actionability. Additionally, the opinion takes account of the…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API