Strouss v. Simmons
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
MARUMOTO, J.
I dissent from that portion of the opinion of the court disallowing interest which was awarded by the circuit court to Bancorp.
*54According to that opinion, Bancorp has priority over Strouss only with respect to principal, but not with respect to interest, because the second proviso of HRS § 507-46 gives priority only to money advanced under and secured by the mortgage, and interest is not money advanced and secured by the mortgage.
I think that, in the context of that proviso, such interpretation is too narrow and unrealistic.
In that connection, I recall a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Electrical Equipment Company v. Security National Bank, John W. Underwood and John P. CooneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979