Legal Opinion · Dissent

Strouss v. Simmons

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1982No. 6960Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

MARUMOTO, J.

I dissent from that portion of the opinion of the court disallowing interest which was awarded by the circuit court to Bancorp.

*54According to that opinion, Bancorp has priority over Strouss only with respect to principal, but not with respect to interest, because the second proviso of HRS § 507-46 gives priority only to money advanced under and secured by the mortgage, and interest is not money advanced and secured by the mortgage.

I think that, in the context of that proviso, such interpretation is too narrow and unrealistic.

In that connection, I recall a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Electrical Equipment Company v. Security National Bank, John W. Underwood and John P. CooneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API