Legal Opinion

United States v. Bok

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 1938No. Nos. 18850, 19752PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, District Judge.,

These are two suits arising out of the income tax liability of the late Cyrus H. K. Curtis for the year 1931. The first suit is by the United States against his executors to recover the amount of -a refund made to his executors in 1933, erroneously, as the government contends. The second is a suit by his executors against the United States under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20), to recover back $10,200 additional tax which he paid and which was not refunded. By stipulation filed October 19, 1937, the cases were consolidated for trial. The facts were all stipulated.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heinz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BokCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. Bank of New York & Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API