United States v. Bok
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, District Judge.,
These are two suits arising out of the income tax liability of the late Cyrus H. K. Curtis for the year 1931. The first suit is by the United States against his executors to recover the amount of -a refund made to his executors in 1933, erroneously, as the government contends. The second is a suit by his executors against the United States under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20), to recover back $10,200 additional tax which he paid and which was not refunded. By stipulation filed October 19, 1937, the cases were consolidated for trial. The facts were all stipulated.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Heinz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BokCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Bank of New York & Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938