Legal Opinion
(HC) Luedtke v. Ciolli
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 30, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01148Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES LUEDTKE, No. 1:20-cv-01148-DAD-EPG-HC 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 14 RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING A. CIOLLI, MOTIONS FOR RECUSAL 15 Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 4, 9, 11) 16 17 Petitioner James Luedtke is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to 19 a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 MOTIONS FOR RECUSAL 21 On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Richard R. SiblaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Rafat AsrarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Raisa R. Mayes v. David A. Leipziger and Levy, Leipziger & NormintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Clarence Christian NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.