Legal Opinion

A. Carlo Guadagno, D.C., P.A. v. United Automobile Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 19, 2011No. 3D11-1419PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.

Upon review of the petition and the response, this Court grants the petition for writ of certiorari and quashes the circuit court’s order denying West Kendall Chiropractic Center’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees. Respondent concedes, and we agree, that the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, should have awarded petitioner appellate attorney’s fees, pursuant to section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (1982), conditioned upon petitioner prevailing in the underlying proceedings. The failure to do so was a departure from the essential requirements of law. See Ramirez v. United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. United Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. De La FeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Comprehensive Health Center, LLC v. United Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mejia v. United Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Mercury Insurance Co. of Florida v. RPM Medical Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Hialeah Medical Associates, Inc. v. United Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Hialeah Medical v. UnitedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pro Health Pain Relief Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API