Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBryson, Circuit Judge
I join the court’s opinion on all issues but one: the majority’s conclusion that payments to the Vermont Clean Energy Development Fund and the requirement to put up a visual barrier at the power plant were unforeseeable and therefore cannot be included in the calculation of ENVY’s damages.
With respect to ENVY’s payments into the Clean Energy Development Fund, I would uphold the trial court’s finding that it was reasonably foreseeable at the time of contract formation that a nuclear operator would be faced with expenses of that type if the government’s breach forced the operator to build a dry…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New York Marine & General Insurance v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.