Legal Opinion

Re/Max of New Jersey, Inc. v. Wausau Insurance Companies

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 8, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PAUL G. LEVY, J.A.D.

Judge Gibson held that plaintiffs were liable for payment of premiums for workers’ compensation insurance coverage benefit-ting its real estate sales agents. Re/Max of New Jersey, Inc. v. Wausau Ins. Cos., 304 N.J.Super. 59, 697 A.2d 977 (Ch.Div.1997). He applied the “relative nature of the work” test, as explained in Kertesz v. Korsh, 296 N.J.Super. 146, 154, 686 A.2d 368 (App.Div.1996), and held that the Re/Max agents are economically dependent on the Re/Max broker, lacking “the ability to act independently.” In the course of his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. MacDougall v. WeichertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Kertesz v. KorshNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mogull v. CB Commercial Real Estate Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Re/Max of New Jersey, Inc. v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  3. Conley v. Oliver & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API