Legal Opinion

Steiner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 21, 1985No. Nos. 84-393, 84-394PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The defendant appeals from concurrent sentences in excess of the guidelines. We affirm.

I

The appellant Steiner was on probation for aggravated battery when he was charged with two counts each of theft from and burglary of rooms at a Marathon motel at which he had previously been employed. Pursuant to a plea bargain accepted by the court, in which the state dropped the other three charges in return for his testimony against a co-defendant, Steiner pled guilty to one burglary count and to violating his probation. It was agreed that the sentencing guidelines would be applied…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. In re Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Weems v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steiner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API