Legal Opinion

Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 23, 1974No. Nos. 74-1160, 74-1209PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Chicago and North Western Transportation Company (“North Western”) appeals the dismissal of its complaints seeking enforcement of its protective services contract with the defendants Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company (“Rock Island”), and Burlington Northern Inc. (“Burlington”). North Western argues on appeal that the district court erroneously concluded that the contract was unenforceable because it had not been submitted to the Interstate Commerce Commission *454as required by Section 1(14) (b) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Pacific Fruit Express Co. v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
  3. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
  4. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Soo Line RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, a Corporation v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, a Corporation v. Burlington Northern Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API