Legal Opinion
Krutz v. Gardner
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1897No. 2734PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Soott, C. J.
In March, 1889, L. M. Robbins and Eliza J. Robbins, husband and wife, executed a mortgage on lot 4 in block 47 of A. A. Denny’s addition to the city of Seat-*333tie to the plaintiff in this action. Thereafter, in the month of April in said year, the city enacted an ordinance for the grading of Lenora street, upon which said lot abutted, and to make the expense of grading the same borne by the property benefited. The lot in question was liable to assessment for the improvement and was assessed for its proportion thereof.- The same not being…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gower v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Bradley v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
- Goodman v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Champaign v. HarmonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Krutz v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1901