Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Galindo v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CNTY.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2010No. S170550Published

1Concurrence

WERDEGAR, J., Concurring.

Before his scheduled preliminary hearing, petitioner moved for Pitchess discovery, that is, discovery of information from the arresting police officers’ personnel files that might be relevant to the officers’ respective credibility. (Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 [113 Cal.Rptr. 897, 522 P.2d 305]; Evid. Code, §§ 1043-1045.) The magistrate denied the motion without prejudice to its renewal before trial, explaining that, before he would grant the motion, “the defense has to logically show they are going to discover something or might discover something…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. CudjoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Nienhouse v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API