Stanfield v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Guadalupe. Tried below before the Hon. James A. Ware.
1Opinion of the Court
Roberts, Chief Justice.
The defendant, being an adult male, is convicted for an aggravated assault upon a child. The facts showed upon the trial that he was the guardian of the child.
The indictment, in anticipation that such would be the proof, perhaps charged the defendant with having beaten the child in a cruel, outrageous, and vicious manner, with intent to injure him.
It states no other specific ground of aggravated assault and battery, as mentioned in the code, (Paschal’s Dig., art. 2150,) than that defendant was an adult male, and that the person beaten was a child.
The court in the charge…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Hogenson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- State v. StraightMontana Supreme Court · 1959
- Carpenter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Assiter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
- Nabors v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.