Legal Opinion
Hanaway v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 27, 1976No. 7321PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.
The plaintiffs appeal (RSA 384:1-a (Supp. 1975); RSA ch. 541) from the decision of the board of trust company incorporation denying their petition to form a trust company in Plymouth. The petition was filed on December 18, 1974, and was denied on July 31, 1975. Under RSA 392:8 I and II (Supp. 1975, Laws 1969, 408:1) the board must consider, among other factors, the capital structure and the earnings prospects of the proposed trust company. See 12 U.S.C.A. §§ 1814, 1816 (1969); 12 C.F.R. § 4.2 (b) (1975). In the present case the board found that the proposed capital was inadequate and “that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackson v. Valley National Bank of Eagan TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Hampton National Bank v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- BANK OF COMMERCE, STILLWELL, OK. v. Banking BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Sugar River Savings Bank v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Glasnapp v. State Banking BoardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- University System v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Bedford Bank v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976