Legal Opinion
Bales v. Murray
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided April 14, 1919PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from Hardin District Court. — B. M. Wright, Judge. Appellants complain because tlie trial court overruled objections made by them to the report of the executor and the executrix.
1Opinion of the Court
Salinger, J.-
I. Many of the rulings now complained cannot be reviewed until we settle just what was controverted in the trial below. The decree recites that:
“It was agreed between all parties by consent of the court that the objections filed and the application of the* *650objectors should be construed to cover two grounds [stating them].”
The appellants contend that no evidence was offered, add that, therefore, the decision of the court is based entirely upon the reports made and objected to. The decree recites that it rests upon this agreement. If there was such agreement, this complaint is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Luther v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Bonds v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Wilts v. WiltsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Markley v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Everitt v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McAllister v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Estate of Clark v. LundySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Estate of Short v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
- In Re the Marriage of Tamara D. Veit and Gregory H. Veit Upon the Petition of Tamara D. VeitSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.