Legal Opinion

Polizos v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1978No. CA 10538PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

Petitioners appeal a denial by the OLCC of their application for a Class A distributor’s license, contending that the order is deficient because the findings of fact are not supported by substantial evidence and the conclusions of law are unsupported by statute, rule or reason.

The Findings

The Commission made these findings of fact:

"1. The Polizos brothers are applying for a Class 'A’ dispenser license (DA) in the trade name 'Acropolis Club’. Applicants own two other outlets with the same trade name with a Commission license to serve beer and wine.
"2. Applicants claim they will specialize in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. McCann v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Sun Ray Drive-In Dairy, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Tierney v. DurisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Sun Ray Drive-In Dairy, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Polizos v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API