Legal Opinion

Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The record presents issues of fact concerning negligence and freedom from contributory negligence. The washing of the floor of a store during business hours presents a different situation from the cleaning of the stairs of an apartment house (Samuels v. Terry Holding Co., 253 N. Y. 593) or the floor of a railroad station (Curtiss v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 233 N. Y. 554).

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. (See 286 N. Y. 700.)

Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur; Lehman, Ch. J., dissents.

Judgments…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. . Lehigh Valley Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Samuels v. Terry Holding Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Surface v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  2. Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API