State v. Hale
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
After waiving trial by jury, appellant was tried before the court and found guilty of an assault with intent to do great bodily harm in violation of § 559.180, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. We affirm.
Appellant contends that the information was insufficient because it alleged that “the assault was made with the intent to do great bodily harm,” which is not included within the wording of § 559.180.
That portion of § 559.180 material to the issue here is as follows: “Every person who shall, on purpose and of malice aforethought, * * * assault or beat another with a deadly weapon, or…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. SelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- State v. GillespieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- State v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- State v. MannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- United States v. Blanca Estella MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. RojewskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.