Legal Opinion

$22,922.00 v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1993No. C14-92-00747-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED OPINION

CANNON, Justice.

This is an appeal of a judgment of forfeiture. Claimant Ronald L. Richardson complains that there was no evidence or insufficient evidence that $22,922 seized by police was proceeds gained from the commission of a felony under the Texas Controlled Substances Act. We affirm.

In response to reports of marihuana sales, Officers Beasley and Brooks set up surveillance of a scrap metal business. Brooks hid in an overgrown lot across the street and spied with a telescope. He was within earshot. Beasley parked in a marked patrol car a short distance away.

Chester…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. $11,014.00Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Fifty-Six Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars in U.S. Currency v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Money of the United States in the Amount of $8,500.00 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. One 1980 Pontiac v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. $7,058.84 in U.S. Currency v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. 1.70 Acres, .20 Acres, & .28 Acres of Real Property & Structures Thereon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
  3. Ex Parte Camara, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  4. Four Thousand One Hundred Eighty-Two Dollars in United States Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
  5. APPROXIMATELY $42,850.00 v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API