Legal Opinion

In re Thornhill

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California

Decided October 12, 2001No. 01-13767-B-13PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEBTORS’ MOTION TO CONFIRM SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 13 PLAN AND DENYING MOTION TO VALUE COLLATERAL

W. RICHARD LEE, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Debtors’ motions to confirm their second amended chapter 13 plan and to value the collateral of R & N Enterprises were argued before the court and taken under submission on September 5, 2001. D. Max Gardner, Esq. appeared on behalf of the Debtors. Frank P. Samples, Esq. appeared on behalf of objecting creditor R & N Enterprises (“R & N”). Also present was the chapter 13 trustee, M. Nelson Enmark. The trustee’s separate objection to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Warren (In Re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Smyrnos v. Padilla (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re MoffetUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
  2. James E. MagerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Steven Istvan CsigiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API