Legal Opinion

Kansas City v. City of Raytown

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 27, 1967No. 52966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, Judge.

Kansas City brought a declaratory judgment action against the City of Raytown, its Mayor and City Council members (herein collectively referred to as Raytown) with reference to a cooperative sewer agreement previously executed by the two cities. An answer and a reply were filed, and then plaintiff and defendants each filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment and entered summary judgment for plaintiff, from which Raytown has appealed. We have jurisdiction because the amount involved exceeds $15,000.

The agreement in question…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis Housing Authority v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Borrson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. McIntyre v. Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. In re the City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Breckenridge v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Hamilton v. Public Water Supply District 2 of Caldwell CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Layne v. City of WindsorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Johns-Manville Corporation v. Village of Dekalb, Missouri, Amos H. WattsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. Little Portion Franciscan Sisters, Inc. v. BoatrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API