Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Paramount Fire Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 21, 1961No. 15769PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Associate Judge.
Rule 166-A, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment. These adversary insurance companies had filed motions for summary judgment; that of paramount being sustained and that of Aetna denied, followed by this appeal.
Background of the proceedings was this: Mr. and Mrs. Sterling D. Holmes, Pauline Reese, and Richardson Savings & Loan Association had sued both insurance companies, the individual plaintiffs being the “purchasers” of house and lot at 3415 Harvard, Highland Park, Dallas, under which contract of sale there had been issued to them a policy of fire…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. AllbrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Wm. Skinner & Sons' Ship-Building & Dry-Dock Co. v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Lawrence B. And Harriet F. Vogel v. Northern Assurance Company, Limited, and Mount Joy Mutual Insurance Company (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Insurance Co. of North America v. AlberstadtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Heath v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Paramount Fire Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1962
- Paramount Fire Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1962