Dean v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from Early superior court—Judge Worrill. April 2, 1918.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
Broyles, P. J.
Even if (as contended by counsel for plaintiff in error in the motion for a rehearing, but which is not conceded by this court) the evidence of the plaintiff’s witnesses did not disprove all of the proximate acts of the defendant’s negligence as alleged in the petition, but on the contrary affirmatively established 'some of these acts, it also clearly and indisputably showed that, by the exercise of ordinary care, the plaintiff’s son, for whose homicide the action was brought, could have avoided the consequences of the defendant’s negligence. Accordingly,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Moore v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Comer v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- White v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.