Legal Opinion
Gray v. City of Salem
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 28, 1930PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
This is a bill in equity brought pursuant to G. L. c. 40, § 53, to restrain the expenditure of money by the city of Salem in payment of a pension to David N. Cook. The defendants named are the city, one Charles G. F. Coker in his capacity as treasurer of the city, and Cook. The plaintiffs are twelve persons alleging themselves to be taxable inhabitants of Salem, and eight others, presumably also taxable inhabitants of the city who have been admitted by amendment.
The bill alleges that on October 4, 1912, the city accepted the provisions of St. 1912, c. 447 (now G. L. c. 32, § 52) which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Holden v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Corkum v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Boston v. Keene Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Paddock v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Horrigan v. Mayor of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Opinion of the Justices To the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Ryder v. Town of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.