Legal Opinion

Shannon Blackwell v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 2016No. WD78669PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGary D. Witt, Judge

The Director of Revenue (the “Director”) appeals a trial court.judgment setting aside the revocation of,. Amanda Harrell’s (“Harrell”) driving . privileges-. The Director argues that the trial court erred in excluding the results of Harrell’s blood- alcohol test. The trial court excluded the test because it found that the Director failed- to show that the • simulator used to test the breath analyzer had been calibrated against a National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) approved thermometer in- connection, with the simulator’s maintenance, as required by the Department of Health…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. White v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Sellenriek v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Kristin Nicole Stiers v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  4. State v. ReichertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Hill v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carey v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Hickenbotham v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. MICHAEL RAY SLEDD, Petitioner-Respondent v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API