Legal Opinion

Packard v. Stephani

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action by Charles W. Packard against Alphonse J. Stephana to recover for services rendered by plaintiff’s assignor as a physician. A verdict was directed for defendant, and plaintiff moved for a new trial on exceptions ordered to be heard at general term in the first instance. Denied.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

This action is brought to recover upon a quantum meruit the reasonable value of the services of John H. Packard, a *1017physician of Philadelphia, for testifying as an expert witness before a commission appointed to examine into the sanity of the defendant, and upon the trial of the defendant for murder. It appears that, in 1885, Dr. Packard had examined the defendant, and subsequent to that period, when passing through New York, had seen him for a moment, and his testimony was required and practically directed to showing the mental and physical condition of the defendant in 1885. Such testimony…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tyrrel v. HammersteinNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Herfurth v. HorineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Brown v. Travellers' Life & Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Batavia Times Publishing Co. v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Regis Radio Corp. v. American Employers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API