Legal Opinion

King County v. United Pacific Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1967No. 39548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Langenbach, J. †

This is an action against respondent Bonnell as judge of the Roxbury District Justice Court together with certain employees of that court and their official bond as defendants. The county sought damages for unfaithful performance of their duties in failing to account for certain funds found missing in an audit by the State Auditor’s office, Division of Municipal Corporations.

Respondent denied that he had any statutory duty to make deposits or in any way to account for the missing funds. He alleged that other court personnel handled these funds for which he was not accountable.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Harp v. Vanderburgh Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Levey v. BigelowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. McClure v. McClurgSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Michigan Central Railroad v. Northern Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Broadfoot v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Crossler v. HilleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. City of Kennewick v. VandergriffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API