Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wright v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided October 28, 2008No. 2986064Published

1Dissent

HALEY, J.,

with whom ELDER and CLEMENTS, JJ., join, dissenting.

In the circuit court, the defendant proffered that the Commonwealth had offered no reason or cause in support of the motion to nolle prosequi the arrest warrant, in direct violation of the mandate of Code § 19.2-265.3. The majority writes: “Therefore, the trial court was entitled to consider the proffer as true.” In sum, the majority concedes the arrest warrant was illegally terminated. Code § 19.2-218 states:

*711No person who is arrested on a charge of felony shall be denied a preliminary hearing upon the question of whether there is…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Air Courier Conference of America v. American Postal Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Webb v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  3. Beck v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  4. Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  5. Charles v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API