Legal Opinion

In Re Reinstatement of Voorhees

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1987No. 15541Published

1Opinion of the Court

403 N.W.2d 738 (1987)

In the Matter of the Petition for Reinstatement of Merlin VOORHEES as an Attorney at Law.

No. 15541.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued January 12, 1987.

Decided April 8, 1987.

R. James Zieser, Tyndall, for Disciplinary Bd. of the State Bar Ass'n.

Ronald G. Schmidt of Schmidt, Schroyer, Colwill, & Barnett, Pierre, for petitioner.

MILLER, Justice.

Petitioner, Merlin Voorhees, was disbarred from the practice of law by order of this Court dated July 9, 1980. The facts surrounding his disbarment are published in Matter of Voorhees, 294 N.W.2d 646 (S.D.1980). Generally stated,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BrodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. In re MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. In Re the Discipline of VoorheesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In re EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API