Legal Opinion
H. B. Claflin Co. v. Kern
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana
Decided April 21, 1893No. 12,059PublishedCited by 2 opinions
At Law. Action by the II. B. Claflin Company against H. Kern & Son. A. Shwartz & Sons intervene. Intervention dismissed, and judgment for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
BILLINGS, District Judge.
On February 20, 1892, the following contract was entered into between the defendants and interveners:
“Agreement.
“This agreement, entered into this 20th day of February, 1892, between H. Kern & Son. of the first paid, asid A. Shwartz & Sons of the second part, witnosseth: The said H. Kem & Son agree to sell to said A. Shwartz & Sons, who bind themselves to purchase, the entire stock in trade, merchandise, fixtures, and all the appurtenances of the dry-goods store, comer of Oanal and DaupMne Sis., with no other exception than one iron safe, one desk, and one stove.
“This…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Heywood Boot & Shoe Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Heywood Boot & Shoe Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935