Green v. Davies
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
■ Appeal by the defendants, Andrew J. Davies and others, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court- in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York oil the 4th day of May, 1904, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, overruling the said defendants’ separate demurrers to the amended complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
Upon a former appeal in this case where the complaint was challenged by demurrer, it was held that it constituted a single cause of action, “ and that is that the plaintiff has. been damaged by the united action of all of the defendants in pursuance of an agreement between them to accomplish an illegal purpose.” (Green v. Davies, 83 App. Div. 216.) The complaint therein, after charging the conspiracy and illegal combination, set out overt acts committed pursuant thereto, consisting .of slanderous words uttered and of libels published.- The amended complaint has made no change in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Place v. . MinsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- People v. . WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Rourke v. Elk Drug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- De Wolfe v. . AbrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dahlquist v. MattsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Moskin v. LydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Bob v. HecksherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- People v. SchumannNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1933
- Bedard v. La BierNew York Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.