Legal Opinion
Meier v. Hayes
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1937No. Civ. 10513PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment foreclosing a mortgage. The judgment was rendered against Belle 0. Hayes as an individual, and also against her as executrix of the estate of John W. Brunton, deceased.
After being served with summons and complaint, Belle 0. Hayes, as executrix of the estate of John W. Brunton, deceased, appeared and filed a general demurrer. At the same time, as an individual, she filed an answer. On being presented, the demurrer was overruled and the executrix stated that she would file an answer similar to the answer she had filed as an individual.
The first point made by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thornagel v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Hurley v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Fish v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Howard v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Duryea v. . MacKeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Katsivalis v. Serrano Reconveyance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Thorpe v. ThorpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Memorial Hosp. of So. Cal. v. STATE HLT. PLANNINGCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Memorial Hospital v. State Health Planning CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.