Legal Opinion

Smith

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 5, 1946PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurchIe, J.

Petitioner’s exceptions to the dismissal of his writ of error involve the construction of R. S. 1930, Chap. 131, Sec. 10 (now R. S. 1944, Chap. 119, Sec. 9), on the single point as to whether the words “or any part thereof” preclude the possibility of sentencing a defaulting executor under separate counts of a single indictment for two embezzlements from one estate.

The first sentence of the statute traces back directly to P. L. 1893, Chap. 241, although the closing words “and shall be punished accordingly” were added to the original language thereof in the statutory revision of 1903, infra,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ElderIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Commonwealth v. ButterickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. BretonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  5. Galeo v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  2. Dwyer v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  3. State v. St. ClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Berger v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  5. Smith v. LovellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API