Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

City of Strongsville v. Johnson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2017No. 104577Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, A.J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:

{¶ 28} I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part with the majority's decision. I agree with the majority that the obstruction of official business conviction should be reversed outright and the failure to display a driver's license should be affirmed. However, I would reverse Johnson's conviction for resisting arrest in violation of R.C. 2921.33(B), but find him guilty of the lesser included offense of resisting arrest in violation of R.C. 2921.33(A) where the element of harm is not necessary. Additionally, I would…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. FussellOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API