Legal Opinion

Voiles v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1935No. 32,074PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The commissioner denied compensation, and on appeal the'district court allowed it. Respondent appeals.

The claimant was working for the Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company. He testified that in the forenoon of December 22, 1933, he reached up for a box of Oxydol, weighing between forty and sixty pounds, and as he attempted to take it down he felt a pain in his back. He quit work. The plant shut down at noon that day and did not open for work until January 2. When the plant reopened claimant went back…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Harmon v. Larabee Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Chrysler Motor Parts Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Daugherty v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Conner v. M & M Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Hardwell v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Cowan v. George W. Kerford Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API