Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Heiner

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1928No. 3252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff has brought suit to recover certain moneys which are alleged to have been illegally collected by the defendant, collector of internal revenue, as part of the taxes of the Thomas Cronin Company for the years 1917 to 1922, inclusive. The parties waived a jury trial. Upon hearing before the court, the following facts were developed:

Findings of Fact.(1) E. J. Harrison and H. R. Donnally are the duly appointed, qualified, and aeting receivers of the Thomas Cronin Company, a corporation; the said receivers having been duly appointed by the court of common pleas…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rice, Barton &. Fales, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
  2. Grays Harbor Motorship Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Harrison v. LewellynDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API