Legal Opinion

Covey v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1990No. 28A01-8910-CR-415PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Richard Covey appeals his conviction of escape.

We affirm.

Covey was tried on the escape charge in absentia. The day of his jury trial, Covey did not appear. Covey’s counsel moved for continuance, giving the following explanation to the court:

My last conversation with him was last Friday. It was my understanding that he intended to be here and I have no information as to why he is not present but in view of my understanding of his intention to be here I would object to the trial proceeding in his absence on the grounds that it will result in some prejudice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Ellis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Maez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Stroud v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Milton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API