Legal Opinion

Crist v. Rayne Township School District

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1941No. Appeal, 31PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keller, P. J.,

Opinion by

The plaintiff became a professional employee of the defendant, a school district of the fourth class, under a contract dated August 30, 1937, drawn in accordance with the provisions of the Teachers’ Tenure Act of April 6, 1937, P. L. 213, and calling for a salary of $800 a year. Under this contract she was assigned to and taught at the Ray School, a one-room school, during the school year 1937-38.

Shortly before the opening of the next school term, she received a notice from the secretary of the school board dated August 31, 1938 stating that “The Rayne Township Schools…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ehret v. Kulpmont Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Walker's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Smith v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Langan v. Pittston School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Bragg v. Swarthmore School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cary v. Lower Merion School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Tressler v. Upper Dublin School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Miller v. StoudnourSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Borough of Clifton Heights v. School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API