Legal Opinion

Mitcham v. Mitcham

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 4, 1935No. 33539PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRUNOT, Justice.

There was judgment for the plaintiff in the court of original jurisdiction. The defendants perfected a suspensive appeal from the judgment, returnable to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. After the case was submitted in the Court of Appeal, that court found that it was without jurisdiction ratione materiae and it entered the following order:

“It is therefore ordered that this appeal be transferred to the Supreme Court. The clerk of this court is ordered to transmit the record to the clerk of the Third district court of Union parish that transcript may be made up and filed in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitney Central Trust & Savings Bank v. Greenwood Planting & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. Scott v. RatcliffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Abraham v. WallenbergSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. Mitcham v. MitchamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frierson v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Cardos v. CristadoroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  3. Pearce ex rel. State Market Commission v. StanfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API