Legal Opinion
Mitcham v. Mitcham
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 4, 1935No. 33539PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNOT, Justice.
There was judgment for the plaintiff in the court of original jurisdiction. The defendants perfected a suspensive appeal from the judgment, returnable to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. After the case was submitted in the Court of Appeal, that court found that it was without jurisdiction ratione materiae and it entered the following order:
“It is therefore ordered that this appeal be transferred to the Supreme Court. The clerk of this court is ordered to transmit the record to the clerk of the Third district court of Union parish that transcript may be made up and filed in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whitney Central Trust & Savings Bank v. Greenwood Planting & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Scott v. RatcliffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Abraham v. WallenbergSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Mitcham v. MitchamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frierson v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Cardos v. CristadoroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Pearce ex rel. State Market Commission v. StanfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971