Legal Opinion

Champion/L.B.S. Associates Development Co. v. E-Z Serve Petroleum Marketing, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1993No. G012930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

In Greene v. Amante (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 684 [4 Cal.Rptr.2d 571], this court held that orders imposing discovery sanctions over $750 are appealable. In the present appeal, we must decide whether sanctions of less than that amount arising out of one discovery motion may be “aggregated” with sanctions arising out of another motion and decided at the same hearing. For appealability purposes, we believe we must look to the offending lawyer’s course of conduct, not the number of motions involved or the fortuity that they were consolidated for hearing. Here, the course of conduct…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greene v. AmanteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. Vallejo City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Bayati v. Town Square M Properties CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Champion/L.B.S. Associates Development Co. v. E-Z Serve Petroleum Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API