Legal Opinion

De Virgilio v. Niosi

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.

With respect to plaintiffs’ motion to strike the answer of defendant Niosi, since the transcript of that defendant’s examination before trial has been delivered, the application is moot and accordingly denied.

Plaintiffs’ motion for an order directing* the defendant to furnish them with a copy of the report of Dr. Gould is granted.

Defendant Niosi has served a formal cross motion for discovery and inspection of the X ray of plaintiff’s skull and of the reports of plaintiff’s treating physician. Such is available to defendant under the provisions of the Civil Practice Act relating to discovery…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Firman v. National Transportation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API