Camp v. Waring
Supreme Court of Connecticut
This was a petition in chancery, brought to the superior court for the county of Fairfield, to obtain the correction of a deed, and an injunction against the prosecution of an action at law. The respondent, on the 31st day of July, 1851, had sold to the petitioner certain real estate in the town of Stamford, known as the Rippowam Foundery.
Read the full summary
This was a petition in chancery, brought to the superior court for the county of Fairfield, to obtain the correction of a deed, and an injunction against the prosecution of an action at law. The respondent, on the 31st day of July, 1851, had sold to the petitioner certain real estate in the town of Stamford, known as the Rippowam Foundery. At the time of the sale it was subject to a mortgage to one Julia Smith, made by the respondent, to secure a note of $5,000, other real estate of the respondent being included in the mortgage. A preliminary contract signed by the parties, and of the above…
1Opinion of the CourtStorrs, C. J.
We are of opinion that it was competent for the superior court, in its discretion, at any time before the passing of a decree in this case, to allow any proper amendments to the petition to be made by the plaintiff; and such amendments are not, therefore, precluded by the return of the report of the committee ; and also that the amend» *528ments proposed to be made are not, in their character, such as are not allowable by the court. Whenever such amendments are allowed, it is discretionary with the court, under all the circumstances of the case, to permit them to be made with or without costs.…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Tillman v. . OgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Church v. HolcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Gardner v. Gauthier Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Mertz v. FlemingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Vincent v. RixNew York Supreme Court · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.